INTERPOL CCF Decision CCF/119/R451.21
CCF/119/R451.21 · Commission for the Control of INTERPOL's Files
The CCF ordered deletion after political and human-rights concerns outweighed the ordinary-crime basis relied on by the requesting NCB.
Judgment Centre
A curated index of public judgments from national courts and international tribunals concerning China, human rights, removal, extradition and persecution risk.
Research note
Some entries include a local official-text archive and a CRM Chinese reference note; others link directly to the court. CRM notes are not official translations. Verify the official text, pinpoint paragraph, citation, status and later proceedings before reliance.
Prefix: CRM-JUDChina-direct / general principleOfficial text and CRM note distinguishedInitial version v1.0
11 public judgments
Liu v. Poland
Application no. 37610/18 · European Court of Human Rights
The proposed extradition to China presented a real risk of ill-treatment in detention; the risk had not been adequately examined.
M.A. and Others v. Bulgaria
Application no. 5115/18 · European Court of Human Rights
Intended removal of five Uyghur applicants to China and the alleged risks of death, arbitrary detention and ill-treatment.
A.L. (X.W.) v. Russia
Application no. 44095/14 · European Court of Human Rights
Forcible return of a person wanted in China would create risks under Articles 2 and 3, including exposure to the death penalty.
Y v. Russia
Application no. 20113/07 · European Court of Human Rights
Proceedings concerning deportation to China and whether return would expose the applicant to treatment contrary to Article 3.
United States v. Burns
2001 SCC 7 · Supreme Court of Canada
A leading judgment on extradition without assurances that the death penalty would not be imposed.
B010 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
2015 SCC 58 · Supreme Court of Canada
Interprets exclusion from refugee protection in alleged people-smuggling cases and addresses the protection framework against return.
Soering v. the United Kingdom
Application no. 14038/88 · European Court of Human Rights
A foundational judgment establishing that extradition may engage Article 3 where the person faces a real risk of prohibited treatment in the receiving state.
Chahal v. the United Kingdom
Application no. 22414/93 · European Court of Human Rights
Confirmed the absolute character of Article 3: national-security concerns cannot justify removal to a real risk of torture or ill-treatment.
Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom
Application no. 8139/09 · European Court of Human Rights
Addresses the assessment of diplomatic assurances and the exceptional bar on removal where there is a real risk of a flagrant denial of justice.
Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
2002 SCC 1 · Supreme Court of Canada
A leading Canadian decision on deportation to a risk of torture, the international prohibition of torture and procedural fairness.