External scrutiny

External Advisers & Peer Review

CRM is forming an independent interdisciplinary review network. Names appear only after consent, identity and conflict checks.

Status: open call and targeted invitations

Unconfirmed people are not listed and logos do not imply collaboration. Reports accurately state internal review, external comments received or externally peer reviewed.

Legal advisers

Extradition, asylum, international human rights, Chinese law, evidence or comparative public law.

Country specialists

China regions, minorities, religion, criminal justice, prisons or transnational repression.

Methods & verification

Social research, open source, digital forensics, data protection and trauma-informed interviewing.

Practice & lived experience

Regulated practitioners, service organisations and affected people able to participate safely.

Review protocol

  1. Fit and conflict screening

    Expertise, office, case connections, funding and relevant interests are recorded.

  2. Anonymous or named review

    Chosen for safety, sensitivity and transparency; comments and editorial disposition are retained.

  3. Structured review

    Questions, sources, method, contrary evidence, reasoning, law, limits and possible harm.

  4. Editorial response

    Acceptance, partial acceptance or rejection is reasoned; material change creates a new version.

  5. Public review status

    Only a completed process earns the external-peer-review label; review does not endorse every conclusion.

Join the review network

State field, jurisdiction, language, attribution preference and conflicts. Do not send identity documents initially.

This opens your email application with a draft to liuhaoyan@gmail.com. Review it before sending.