CRM-METHOD · Institutional standard

Research and Evidence Methodology

The common research standard for CRM records, editorial summaries, country information, legal analysis and independent reports.

CRM INSTITUTIONAL POLICY · VERSION 1.0 · JULY 2026

Purpose

CRM does not treat all publicly available information as equally reliable. We assess source proximity, independence, timing, possible bias, corroboration and the risks of publication.

Research process

Six-stage process

01

Define

Set the research question, audience, scope and terms of reference.

02

Search

Record the search period, terms, coverage and source types.

03

Assess

Examine proximity, independence, expertise, motive and potential bias.

04

Corroborate

Compare dates, locations, identities, procedures and material facts.

05

Review

Apply factual, editorial, legal and safety review where appropriate.

06

Version

Identify publication date, version, limitations and corrections.

Content classification

Content labels

CRM Original ResearchCountry InformationExternal Authoritative ReportCRM Editorial SummaryLegal AnalysisVerified RecordPreliminary RecordRepublished CommentaryUnofficial Translation

Each item should identify the original publisher or author, CRM’s editorial responsibility, verification limits and whether it represents an institutional position.

Confidence language

Findings and confidence

CRM uses controlled language including confirmed, highly likely, available evidence indicates, available evidence suggests, unable to determine and contested.

Ethics & safety

Do no harm

Sensitive material is not made public merely because it has been submitted. Publication considers consent, data minimisation, anonymisation and retaliation risk.

Challenge our work

Individuals and institutions may submit evidence-based corrections or methodological concerns.

Corrections policy