Institutional engagement

Media, Parliamentary & Professional Partnerships

Turning CRM research into accurate reporting, public scrutiny, forensic practice and professional capacity while preserving independence and safety.

01

Media

Fact-checking, briefing, source location, data interpretation and expert interviews, with clear on-record, background and non-attributable terms.

02

Parliament & policy

Written evidence, committee briefing, roundtables, COI and policy options; non-partisan with relevant interests disclosed.

03

Legal & professional bodies

Continuing education, case-law and COI updates, seminars, expert referral and research-question identification.

04

Universities & research

Joint design, methods advice, student projects, data dictionaries and peer review, with authorship and governance agreed first.

05

Rights & service organisations

Safe referral, preservation training, trend identification and informed participation without unauthorised case-data exchange.

Non-negotiable terms

Editorial independenceNo purchase of conclusions, suppression of adverse findings or advance control.

Accurate relationship claimsPartner language and logos only after written agreement.

Safety and consentNo identifiable victim or source disclosure for publicity or convenience.

Funding transparencyResearch-related funding, in-kind support and conflicts are disclosed.

Embargo and correctionReasonable embargoes may be agreed, not permanent suppression; errors follow the correction policy.

Non-partisanParliamentary and government work serves evidence and rights standards, not parties or candidates.

Propose an engagement

State organisation, contact, audience, output, timetable, publication and funding. Do not attach sensitive case material initially.

This opens your email application with a draft to liuhaoyan@gmail.com. Review it before sending.